Doubting MLK During a Strike in Memphis
Reprint from The Atlantic Online
A retired
Presbyterian pastor looks back on 1968, when he participated in the
civil-rights struggle but hadn’t yet embraced the principles of nonviolence.
Jan 13, 2018
I was a senior in college in 1968 at Southwestern at Memphis
(now Rhodes College), when the garbage workers strike in Memphis came to the
public eye. I joined other Southwestern
students who were part of that strike.
That movement was part of a continuing shift for me in my own
consciousness, as I began to change from a white person raised in the
segregated South to a white person who gradually began to see how captive I was
to the power of race.
I had been
taught racism by really decent white people in my hometown on the Arkansas side
of the Mississippi River Delta – my family, my church, my teachers. I believed that white people were superior,
and that black people would never be our peers or equals. If at times my experience seemed to teach
otherwise, I was like Thomas Jefferson in his writings on “Notes on
Virginia.” Though he agonized over the
ideas of equality and slavery, he
indicated that he could not find evidence of the equality of people of African
heritage.
Education
was one of my paths out of this total captivity to race. Though most of my public school teachers were
believers in race, one of my English teachers, a Jewish woman in our small
Arkansas town, suggested that I read Alan Paton’s “Cry, the Beloved Country”
about apartheid in South Africa. I read
it, and in it I met my first black person.
Oh yes, I had seen many black people in my youth, but I had not
considered any of them to be a person as I was.
My college
years began to expand my horizons, and I began to hang out with the first black
students at Southwestern. In my junior
year, I was one of the leaders of demonstrations that helped to close down a
restaurant that refused to serve one of my black friends. As 1968 began, I joined other white and
black young people around the country who had begun to believe that Martin
Luther King, Jr. and his way of nonviolence were not only irrelevant, but were
counterproductive and even dangerous.
Though I was not yet swayed by H. Rap Brown’s emphasis on the
fundamental nature of violence in American life, it seemed to be the only way
that justice might come for people of African heritage.
I jumped
into the garbage strike, going on marches, seeking to organize and educate
others. I was part of group of students
who went to churches on Sunday mornings, standing up to interrupt worship to
shout “Support the garbage strike.” We
would usually be escorted out of worship, but a few people were
sympathetic. I retired from the
ministry in 2017, and I have often wondered what I would have done as a worship
leader, if such interruptions had come in my time. Fortunately, none ever did, and I’d like to
think that it was because Oakhurst Presbyterian was such a progressive church,
but I know that the issue remains in my heart.
Many of us
felt that there was a possibility of victory in the garbage strike, and when
Dr. King agreed to come to Memphis to support the strike, we had ambivalent
feelings. It seemed to us that he was
only trying to capture the headlines, and the organizing seemed to be going well
without him. When his first march was
organized, it ended in violence, as black youth and police clashed. Dr. King seemed stunned that the black youth
did not hold him and his principle of nonviolence in high esteem, and he was
returning to Memphis in early April of 1968 to organize a bigger march that he
intended to stay nonviolent. I had an
opportunity to go to Mason Temple to hear what would be his last sermon on
April 3, but to my eternal regret, my lack of respect for him and my cynicism
kept me from attending.
I was
working in the college library on the evening of April 4, and when my shift
ended a little after 6 PM, I was walking out of the library, and one of my
black student friends came up to me to say, in anger and in disgust, that Dr.
King had been shot and would likely not live.
He then asked me: “Some of my
friends are organizing for the revolutionary fight. We want to buy guns. Can you lend me some money to help buy
guns?” I was stunned by his revelation
and by his question, and I did not know how to respond. I have racked my brain, but I cannot remember
whether I gave him any money or not. I
was a relatively poor student, and I did not have money to spare anyway.
Violence
followed in Memphis and throughout the country – the great apostle of nonviolence
was gunned down by white people, and it seemed like all hope was lost. I remember the National Guard armored cars
riding up and down the streets in Memphis, and I remember feeling lost and
forlorn. That feeling was strengthened
by the assassination of Robert Kennedy two months later and by the violence of
the police at the Democratic convention in that summer, followed by the
election of Richard Nixon as president that fall.
I have
thought over these events many times since then, and I have gained great
respect for Dr. King over the years – I wish that I had known then what I know
now! Though it is greatly diminished,
the power of race remains in me. And,
though I understand the impulse and sometimes the agency of violence, I am
firmly committed to the principle of nonviolent resistance which Dr. King
developed so well. The continuing
struggle for equality for black people, for women, for immigrants, for LGBTQ
people reminds me that this struggle is ongoing in American history. I don’t know if 2018 will be similar to 1968
or not, but I do know that in all of our work, the two forces of love and
justice must be kept in proper tension.
As James Cone indicated in his fine book on Dr. King and Malcolm X, King began with love and moved towards justice,
while Malcolm X began with justice and moved towards love. Both of those must be present if we are to
build and sustain movements and communities dedicated to equity and justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment