“JAMES CONE”
On
Saturday, April 28, my friend Gayraud Wilmore called me to tell me that James
Cone had died that morning from cancer.
Gay and James Cone were long time colleagues and friends, having written
together two volumes of a seminal work on black history and black theology: “Black Theology: A Documentary History.” I had known that Dr. Cone was gravely ill,
but like many of you, I was taken aback by his death. One of my white theologian colleagues called
Cone the greatest American theologian of the 20th century and
perhaps of all of American history.
He and I
share a couple of similarities: he was
short, and he was from Arkansas. He was born in Fordyce and grew up in Beardon,
in towns between Pine Bluff and El Dorado.
Growing up in white supremacy, I never knew him or knew who he was until
his book “Black Theology and Black Power” burst upon the scene. He argued persuasively that there was a river
(to borrow from Vincent Harding) of black theology and black power that had
been flowing through American history, and that it was now bursting out from
its underground streams to make its impact upon our lives together.
James Cone
published many other books, and although I never met him, his work had great
impact upon my thinking and my perceptual apparatus. He influenced me in many ways, but three
stand out for me. First, although he was
not the origin of it, he spoke in new ways about the value of the black
experience. Though the word “black
experience” is complex and has many meanings, Cone basically used it to
describe a fundamental sense of being marginalized by the culture. No matter how much money one has or what
status one has achieved, there still can, and often will be, those moments when
white supremacist culture rises to remind one of their marginalized
status. Though Cone lamented this
reality, he did not hang his individual or cultural head in shame. In fact, he sought to appropriate “blackness”
as a more profound way into the human spirit, as a safeguard against the
dominant white supremacist culture. Indeed
he used it as a springboard to a deeper meaning of life, and he joined in and
added verses to the idea that “black is beautiful.”
Second, as
a Christian theologian, he moved the Gospel message and the Biblical message
from the domination of European models to the black experience. He helped us hear in ways that we had not
heard before: Jesus was black. In the life of Jesus of Nazareth, we see the
movement of blackness into the Trinity, into the Godhead herself. Those who have been reading my series of
articles in Hospitality Magazine will recognize that Cone (and Gay Wilmore and Jacqueline
Grant) is a primary source of the black Jesus.
In referring to Jesus as black, Cone reminds us of two important things
about the Gospel that we often forget (or choose to dis-remember) in our
affluent, capitalisitc society. First,
Jesus was not white. Jesus was
dark-skinned, a brown Palestinian Jew. In
our color-soaked society, this is revolutionary. The Lord and Savior claimed by the white
evangelicals, who elected Trump as president, is dark-skinned. But, Cone was not content to stay on the
skin-color level. He asserted that Jesus
was “black,” that the life and death and resurrection of Jesus are rooted in
the black experience in the West, and indeed in all sectors of life. Jesus was black because Jesus was oppressed,
living his life on the margins, lynched by a mob under the tacit approval of
the Roman empire, and raised by a God who brought new life into the old, dead
world. Cone pushed this idea to its most
powerful form in emphasizing that Jesus pointed us to the “God of the
oppressed,” the title of one of his fine books.
Cone’s
third primary emphasis for me was his insistence that those who are classified
as “white” must come to terms with our addiction to race and racism before we
can make steps toward salvation. I’ve
listed elsewhere the seven steps that we as “white” folk must work in order to
begin to find our true identity as children of God (recognition, repentance,
resistance, resilience, reparations, reconciliation, recovery). In theological terms, I would call it our
captivity. Our hearts and minds and
perceptual apparatus have been taken over by the power of race, and until we
can acknowledge that and seek to find liberation, we will simply be fooling
ourselves if we seek to call ourselves Christians.
So, thanks
to God for James Cone, and thanks to James Cone for his ministry and fierce
commitment to justice. If you are not
familiar with him, check out one of his many books. If you have not read any of them, start with
“Martin and Malcolm and America,” a brilliant study of the relationship between
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Or,
you can check out his powerful “The Cross and the Lynching Tree.” In light of the subject of this last book,
there is no small irony that Cone passed on to the next realm in the same week
that the National Memorial on lynching opened in Montgomery.
Good thoughts as always, Nibs,
ReplyDeleteThanks, Howard, and thanks for your work in seeking to make Cone's insights resonate for all of us!
Deletegreat
ReplyDelete