“WHICH SIDE ARE WE ON?”
This is a
big week for me in that Caroline’s and my 45th wedding anniversary
was May 18. We got married in Ed
Loring’s back yard, just two blocks from where we now live. Ed and Caroline’s longtime mentor, Sandy
Winter, presided at the ceremony on a hot Saturday. Our wedding was unusual at the time in that
it was outside, and the food for our reception was covered dishes brought by
those attending the wedding. Our kids
called it a “hippie wedding,” when they were young, and I guess that it was! Both Caroline and I had hair down to our
shoulders, and the total cost was $400 (mainly for the beer and the meat that
we provided for the lunch beforehand).
The gathering lasted 12 hours – we had lunch before the ceremony, and
then people partied on into the night (long after Caroline and I had gone to
sleep). It has been a great journey so
far, and as Caroline put it, quoting the great Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes
fame), “the days have been just packed!”
This has
also usually been a big week in American history, because the Supreme Court
often starts announcing many of its decisions from the cases it heard in the
previous year. On our anniversary date
in 1896, SCOTUS decided 8-1 that “separate but equal” was the law of the land
in Plessy v. Ferguson. As we all know, they meant “separate and
unequal,” and they gave the legal cover for neo-slavery to be re-established in
the nation. Indeed, in 1898, by a 9-0
vote, they rejected a case from black parents in Augusta, Georgia, asking for
equal funding and facilities for the segregated schools there. Though they said “separate but equal,” they
definitely meant “separate and unequal.”
It would
take 58 years for SCOTUS to begin to rectify that 1896 decision. In a 9-0 decision announced on May 17, 1954,
they declared that “separate but equal” was unconstitutional and that the
neo-slavery established by that decision now needed to be dismantled. That decision in Brown v. Board of Education
of Topeka, Kansas, is still being adjudicated, because white resistance to
education of people of color is deep and long and wide in American
history. It would be 11 more years
before a strong blow to neo-slavery would be passed into law. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 began to erode
some of the foundations of neo-slavery, and we have wrestled with that ever
since then. Indeed, in June of 2013,
SCOTUS sought to move us back closer to neo-slavery by eviscerating the Voting
Rights Act by a 5-4 vote. If that Act
had still been in force, Stacey Abrams would be governor of Georgia right
now. Fortunately for us, Stacey is well
aware of this and is hard at work to rectify it.
The fundamental issue is whether we will return to
neo-slavery and its building up of white supremacy – that still hangs in the
balance.
This has also
been big week because it has seen the war on women resume in full force. All the FGFBM laws that have been passed last
week (and surely more to come) are a direct attack on the fundamental
personhood and rights of women. The
Forced Gestation and Forced Birth Movement has been gaining ground, and now it
hopes to force women to be pregnant and to have babies under the guise of the
sanctity of life. There is no greater
sign of the hypocrisy and real intent of these laws than the state of Alabama
outlawing abortion on one day and executing a prisoner the next – so much for
the sanctity of life. Similar to the war
of white supremacy, we are now in a war on women, and let us make no mistake. There is no intention to preserve life in
these new laws – there is only the intention to oppress women and control their
bodies. If there were intention to
enforce the sanctity of life, we would see meaningful parental leave, universal
health insurance, day care for all, the end of the death penalty, and many
other steps.
And, let us
make no mistake here – we are in a battle for our lives. There is no neutral ground, there are no
nuanced positions. We are either going
to seek to destroy white supremacy, or we are not. We are either going to support the full humanity
of women, or we are not. As the old
union song, written by Florence Reese, used to put it in the organizing wars in
the coal mines of Kentucky:
“Which side are you on boys
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on boys
Which side are you on?
They say in Harlan County
There ain’t no neutrals there,
You’ll either be a union {man}
Or a thug for J. H. Blair.”
Thank you Nibs for your insightful post; as a woman I do feel the 'war', but I am confused about who started it and who is "after us"...?? God help us all, especially the USA.
ReplyDelete